A non-performing loan (NPL) is a loan where the borrower is not meeting payments and the lender judges full repayment doubtful, commonly once payments are 90 days past due.
Also known as: NPL, problem loan, impaired loan, non performing loan
Key points
- Being past due is not the same as non-performing: NPLs show deeper deterioration such as persistent arrears, covenant breaches or an insolvency event.
- The 90-day threshold is a common bright line, but a loan can be non-performing earlier, for example if the borrower enters administration.
- Under IFRS 9, adopted in Australia through the AASB, NPLs generally sit in Stage 3 as credit-impaired with a lifetime expected credit loss provision.
- Lenders track the NPL ratio (NPLs over gross loans) and coverage ratio (provisions over NPLs); rising NPLs with falling coverage is a warning sign.
- Resolution runs from early engagement and forbearance through restructuring, enforcement of security and, finally, sale of the loan or write-off.
How NPLs are defined
Regulators and accounting standards emphasise different things. APRA's prudential reporting requires banks to identify impaired exposures and report arrears series and provisioning; it often flags 90 days past due but expects judgement where a borrower has deteriorated badly before then. IFRS 9, adopted through the AASB, uses an expected credit loss model with three stages, and an exposure that is credit-impaired sits in Stage 3. Market disclosure typically uses the 90-day line.
Because the definitions differ, a loan can be past due without being non-performing under IFRS 9 if forward-looking information does not indicate impairment, and a loan can be non-performing before 90 days if, say, the borrower is in default on covenants or has entered administration.
Types of NPL and how they are measured
Risk drivers differ by portfolio. Residential mortgage NPLs usually carry a lower loss given default but move with the housing cycle. Commercial and corporate NPLs are more complex to restructure and depend on collateral quality, property development loans carry project and market risk, unsecured consumer loans attract higher provisioning, and asset finance and equipment finance NPLs depend on the resale value and location of a depreciating asset.
The core measures are the NPL ratio (non-performing loans divided by total gross loans), the coverage ratio (loan loss provisions divided by NPLs) and the provision rate to gross loans. Flow metrics, meaning new loans entering non-performing status each month or quarter, show new stress better than the stock figure, and the write-off rate shows realised losses.
How lenders manage and resolve NPLs
The toolkit runs in rough order. Early engagement starts at the first missed payment or covenant breach: contact the borrower, ask for cashflow forecasts and assess hardship. Forbearance such as payment holidays, interest-only periods or reduced instalments preserves value but can delay loss recognition. Restructuring changes the term, the rate, the covenants or the amount owed, and a big enough change means the lender has to treat it as a new loan in its accounts.
Where the borrower is not viable the lender moves to workout and enforcement, including receivership, repossession and sale of collateral, weighed against legal cost and time. Distressed loans can be sold at a discount to investors that specialise in recovery, handed to a specialist servicer that collects for a fee, or packaged into securities priced on expected recoveries less servicing and legal costs. Loans with remote recovery prospects are written off, with tax deductibility depending on ATO rules.
Example
A lender has $50 million of gross loans, of which $2.5 million are non-performing, so its NPL ratio is 2.5 million divided by 50 million, or 5%. It holds $1 million of loan loss provisions against those loans, so its coverage ratio is 1 million divided by 2.5 million, or 40%. If NPLs keep rising next quarter while provisions stay at $1 million, coverage falls, and the flow of new NPLs, not just the stock, is the figure to watch.
Not to be confused with
- Default
- a default is a legal or contractual event on a specific loan; non-performing is an accounting and prudential classification, and the two overlap without being identical
- Arrears
- arrears are any overdue payments, tracked from day one; a loan usually becomes non-performing only when arrears are persistent or repayment is doubtful
- Bad debt
- a bad debt is a business's unrecoverable receivable written off for tax; an NPL is a lender's classification of a loan that may still be recovered
Frequently asked questions
What makes a loan non-performing?
The borrower is not meeting contractual payments and the lender judges that full repayment is doubtful without recovery action or a material concession. The usual evidence is 90 or more days past due, but covenant breaches, an insolvency event or other objective signs of impairment can put a loan into the category earlier.
How is the NPL ratio calculated?
Divide non-performing loans by total gross loans and multiply by 100. A lender with $2.5 million of NPLs on $50 million of gross loans has an NPL ratio of 5%. Lenders also watch the coverage ratio, which is loan loss provisions divided by NPLs, and the flow of new loans into non-performing status.
What is the difference between a non-performing loan and a default?
Default is typically a legal event or a contract-specific trigger, such as missed payments beyond the grace period or a covenant breach. Non-performing is an accounting and prudential classification that reflects significant credit deterioration. A loan in default is usually non-performing, but the two labels are applied by different rules and do not always coincide.
How does IFRS 9 treat non-performing loans?
IFRS 9, applied in Australia through the AASB, requires forward-looking expected credit loss provisioning in three stages. Performing loans sit in Stage 1 with a 12-month expected loss, loans with a significant increase in credit risk move to Stage 2 with lifetime expected loss, and credit-impaired loans, where most NPLs land, sit in Stage 3.
Can a borrower negotiate to avoid an NPL classification?
A borrower can negotiate forbearance or a modification, and early contact with a realistic cashflow forecast and restructuring proposal helps. The lender may still have to recognise impairment under the accounting rules, depending on the concession granted and the borrower's outlook, so a restructure does not automatically keep the loan performing.
Related terms
Default
A default is a borrower's failure to meet the terms of a credit contract, usually by missing repayments, which lets the lender demand the balance and enforce its security.
Read definitionArrears
Arrears are overdue repayments on a loan or credit account: the borrower has missed instalments, which the lender tracks by days past due and which can lead to a default.
Read definitionBad debt
A bad debt is an amount owed to your business, usually an unpaid invoice already counted as income, that you cannot recover despite reasonable efforts and so write off.
Read definitionCredit loss
Credit loss is the amount a lender or creditor expects not to recover from a loan, trade receivable or lease because the borrower fails to pay.
Read definitionProbability of default (PD)
Probability of default (PD) is an estimate of the chance that a borrower will fail to meet their contractual repayments within a set period, usually one year.
Read definitionHardship
Financial hardship is when a change in your circumstances, such as job loss or illness, means you cannot meet your loan, credit or bill repayments on time.
Read definitionGo deeper
Sources
This article is general information only and is not financial advice.